I haven’t written on my blog for a long time, but recent policy changes in Oakland have generated a lot of personal thoughts that I need to write down instead of posting about it on Facebook or going on a twitter “rant”.
Most Oakland residents would say that Oakland has a problem with protests that get in the way of Oakland being able to prosper. I say that the Oakland government has a problem with not addressing issues which causes protests that sometimes ends up with small groups expressing frustration that leads to vandalism that, some sectors believe, prohibits Oakland’s ability to prosper.
These problems are not unique to Oakland. However, the Oakland government has chosen to enact policy and practice changes that they hope will help Oakland get back to business and not be distracted by protests.
How the hell is someone supposed to get into the city council meeting if they can’t get into the bldg where the meeting is held?? #oakmtg
— TDL (@tdlove5) May 20, 2015
- New City Council Meeting Attendance Policies: On May 5th, in order to protest the new market rate development of a high-rise on the E. 12th Street parcel near Lake Merritt, which critics say will contribute to the gentrification of the East Lake Neighborhood, protestors shut down an Oakland city council meeting. In response, the Oakland City Council announced new rules in order to prevent disruption of public meetings. People who attended the following city council meeting on May 19th were searched and had to sign-in in order to attend. There was also an abundance of police officers on hand. A staff member of the city administration said this wasn’t a City Council rule, but something security officers did to secure the building. However, there was a meeting happening at the same time in another part of the building and those participants didn’t have to sign-in or submit to search. Besides, even if it were true that the new search and sign-in procedure wasn’t a requirement to get into the city council meeting, how do you attend a meeting if you can’t get into the building? The new city council meeting attendance policies shuts out community by limiting their ability to attend the meeting without compromising their autonomy and privacy. This effectively reduces community presence. (Booo!)
- City Council Meeting Scheduling Practices: An ongoing practice at city council has also managed to reduce community presence. Over the past year, Oakland City Council has increasingly scheduled ‘special meetings’ addressing important subjects that are held during the day at a time where it is inconvenient for community to attend and with only needing to give 48-hour notice. This makes it difficult for organizations to gather community speakers to attend meetings. It makes it hard for individuals who want to attend as well. Even if city council decides to discuss important subjects at the regular city council meeting time of 5:30 pm on 1st, 3rd, and 5th Tuesday nights, they then may schedule the item so late in the agenda that it may be 10 pm or midnight before you get to speak. A community member may have to go home and put their kids to sleep, or maybe they have to go to work in the morning. They end up leaving the meeting and their voice effectively silenced. (whomp, whomp..whooooommmp)
- New Enforcement of Crowd Control Rules: In May, after a large May Day protest to address poor working conditions and police violence, a small group of protestors vandalized a major auto-row business section of Broadway. In response, the Mayor has enforced a ban on night time protesting, limiting marches to sidewalks. The following weekend saw peaceful protests with an abundant police force on-hand to kettle demonstrations and issue arrests and citations. No vandalism occurred during these peaceful protests, but, this was still another attempt to effectively silence community voice. (sigh)
Some of you may say that the city isn’t silencing community with the new enforcement of night-time marches ban. Community can still hold their demonstrations by working with administration to get permits and hold day time protests. Let me demonstrate the problems with this scenario.
1. Working with the city for permitted demonstrations. Let’s just say there is another officer involved shooting of a person of color somewhere in Florida at 3 pm (PST). The news of this incident spreads like crazy over social media. The black and brown communities all across America is in mourning.
A prominent activist figures Oakland should gather together to express solidarity with the family and community impacted by the latest example of police abuse of power. They want to hold a vigil at Frank Ogawa Plaza and a march to Oakland’s police department to express their feelings over the Florida incident and remind the city that Oakland still has a long way to go within their own police department. So the activist decides to follow the newly enforced rules of working with the city to get permission. They call the city administration’s office to ask permission to hold the vigil and march. Oops, no one answers, so they leave a voicemail making the request and asking someone to get back to them. A good and responsive staff member may call them back the very same day to get the ball rolling. But maybe the staff person is busy with a heavy work load and doesn’t see the voicemail until tomorrow morning.
Welp, there goes that responsive evening protest. Oh well, it’s still a new and fresh incident. We can hold the protest tomorrow, right?
The city staff person responds and says, sure you can hold a protest. Are you going to have music? You need a permit for that. Will this result in a street closure? You need a permit for that. Will there need to be police present for security? You need to apply for a permit with the police department for all of these things. How long will that take, you ask? It may take a couple of days to process this request. Is it free, you ask? It may cost you a couple of hundred dollars.
Maybe you have the money. Maybe you don’t. Maybe you have the time and patience to fill out these forms and continue to communicate with city and police dept staff to organize a perfectly permissable peaceful march through the streets of Oakland during the day that maybe a couple of hundred people who can get the day off to attend…two weeks later.
In the meantime, cities across America are marching in solidarity against Florida’s crazy police department and Oakland, the bastion free speech and political demonstrations, is silent. (sniff)
2. You can still march on sidewalks. No, we can’t. I was present during the Saturday night protest. This demonstration included a gathering at Frank Ogawa Plaza, a march down Broadway, and another march towards Jack London Square that ended with a sit-in on 3rd and Washington. Many participants, including myself, stayed on the sidewalks. After a certain amount of time, police declared the assembly unlawful and started making arrests. After spending a period of time making sure that protestors on the streets were safe, some of us decided to leave. Still some of us on the sidewalks were pulled and cited. Side walk participants were also kettled and told they had to leave the area, pushed along and followed by police. We were essentially made to feel that we weren’t welcome on the sidewalks or on the streets. (awwwwww..man!!)
So we stop outside of the club but apparently they don’t want us to be together. #BreakTheCurfew #Oakland #oakmtg pic.twitter.com/dJV6XTudoI — TDL (@tdlove5) May 24, 2015
All of these new policies and practices don’t really do anything except silence the voice of community. These are just quick solutions to solve an “annoying” problem. These strategies may not even be legal. The National Lawyer’s Guild has come out strongly against the ban, and it’s actually against the Brown Act to compel residents to list their names at a public city meeting. The scheduling of city council meetings is a council perogative, but is it right thing to do, especially when many of these council members campaigned to get into office with messages saying they are pro- community particpation?
The message that Oakland government is sending to the community is that they would rather continue with doing the business of the city than allow the community to communicate how they feel about what is happening around them. Sure electeds may say that you can always email the city council how you feel. You may even make an appointment with your council members and talk about your concerns. Heck, come and visit me at office hours! Maybe those things aren’t easily convenient to a lot of community members. What other avenue do they have?
In the meantime, elected officials are super slow to adopt policy and practice changes that will actually address the issues the community feels the need to protest about. So while the clock is ticking, police across the nation and in Oakland can continue to overuse their power with little to no consequence. High rise developments in Oakland can be built at market rate pricing, with minimum community benefits that reduces the amount of available space for affordable housing. Communities of color will continue to be made to feel like second class citizens, forced to either leave Oakland or suffer and watch their home town change to something they don’t recognize.
And now community members can’t even easily voice their opinion about it.
At least we still have the internet.